“Overturn this sledgehammer ruling” – Anyenini tells AG over Agradaa’s reduced jail term

By
Makay
-
0
29
Samson Lardy Anyenini

Samson Lardy Anyenini, a legal practitioner and broadcast journalist, has told the Attorney General to act and appeal the reduced sentence handed to evangelist Patricia Asiedua, commonly known as Agradaa.

According to Anyenini, Agradaa was convicted of misdemeanour and second-degree felony.

He stressed that under the old legal regime, the maximum custodial sentence should not exceed 10 years.

Samson Lardy Anyenini urged the Attorney General to take up the matter in the Court of Appeal to reverse the sentence.

Anyenini further urged the AG to overturn the sledgehammer ruling and restore the teeth to our criminal justice system, warning that failure would amount to an abdication of the state’s duty to protect the public.

Speaking on JoyNews’ NewsFile on Saturday, February 7, 2026, Anyenini stated, “This is not where you sit back and say, ‘Oh, I did my case, got 15 years, and the court has reduced it to one year, so my job is done. No, the state, which has hired you to work, requires you to take this case up to the Court of Appeal and get this sentence reversed,” he stated.

Samson Lardy Anyenini stressed that Ghana’s Justice thresholds were not set for nothing.

“If the state does not appeal this reduction, it signals an abdication of its duty to protect the public from such spiritual predators,” he indicated.

“I mean, the repentant, unquote, get a pass, while the poor rot in jail for stealing a goat. AG, it is time to act. Overturn this sledgehammer ruling and restore the teeth to our criminal justice system,” he said.

In that same vein, Legal experts and public commentators, Austin Kwabena Brako-Powers, has critcised the Amasaman High Court Judge for reducing the sentence of spiritualist Patricia Asiedu, popularly known as Agradaa, from 15 years to just 12 months.

According to Brako-Powers, the Amasaman High Court decision is absurd and a mockery of the law.

Brako-Powers highlighted that the judge’s decision is surprising, arguing that it sends the wrong signal to the public.

He explained that the judge’s decision almost reclassifies a serious felony as a mere misdemeanour, adding that a Second-degree felonies are serious crimes.

Speaking on 3FM’s Midday News on Thursday, February 5, 2026, Mr Brako-Powers explained, “It is quite surprising, but it is not new for an appellate court to reduce a sentence from 15 years to just 12 months. The key question people will be asking is: Is this really legal?”

“The imposition of jail time or years of imprisonment is discretionary. Just that the law has circumscribed the years that must be imposed,” he added.

Brako-Powers added, “To reduce a sentence from 15 years to just one year is absurd. At that point, it almost reclassifies a serious felony as a mere misdemeanour. Judges must take solace in the law and act within the legal framework. Anything less undermines justice.”

 “The State has options. Acts like these should be met with sanctions that deter others. One year is simply inadequate for a crime of this magnitude,” he said.

Mr Brako-Powers also emphasised, “The judge’s decision has made a mockery of the law. Second-degree felonies are serious crimes, and leniency of this kind erodes trust in our criminal justice system”.

Their comments follow the Amasaman High Court’s decision yesterday, February 5, 2026, describing Agradaa’s original punishment as harsh and excessive under the circumstances of the case.

The Amasaman High Court, in its decision, affirmed her conviction but exercised its discretion to vary the sentence, reducing the 15 years of hard labour earlier imposed by the trial court.

Agradaa’s revised sentence takes effect from July 3, 2025, the date of her conviction, which means she will serve a total of 12 months in prison.

The court decision will now see Agradaa being freed from prison by July 2026.

The Amasaman High Court added that although the offences for which Agradaa was convicted warranted punishment, the severity of the initial sentence was disproportionate under the circumstances, justifying a downward adjustment.

Watch the video below: