‘Akonta Mining is not engaged in illegal mining’ – Akufo-Addo’s video resurfaced after Wontumi’s 20-year sentence

0
69
Former President Akufo-Addo

A viral video of former President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo defending Akonta Mining in 2023 has resurfaced following the conviction of the company’s owner, Bernard Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi, in the Samreboi illegal mining case.

In 2023, Akufo-Addo publicly rejected claims that Akonta Mining was involved in illegal mining activities.

STOP THAT SCAMMER Verify Numbers on TrustGH

Akufo-Addo boldly told the gathering that the company was not engaged in galamsey anywhere in the country.

Speaking at the Public gathering, Akufo-Addo, then president, stated, “Before I take my seat, let me respond briefly to the chairperson on the issue of illegal mining. I want to assure him and all of you that Akonta Mining is not engaged in any illegal mining anywhere in Ghana as we speak”.

The video has resurfaced following the Accra High Court sentencing Chairman Wontumi to 20 years’ imprisonment.

The presiding Judge, Justice Audrey Kocuvie-Tay, delivered the sentence shortly after 11:40 am on Monday, July 20, 2026, which brings an end to one of Ghana’s most closely watched illegal mining prosecutions case.

Justice Audrey Kocuvie-Tay also imposed a fine of 10,000 penalty units on Wontumi, with a default sentence of three years’ imprisonment if the fine is not paid.

Justice Kocuvie-Tay had earlier found Wontumi guilty on all six counts, including assigning mineral rights without approval and purposely facilitating an unlicensed mining operation contrary to the Minerals and Mining Act, 2006 (Act 703), as amended.

Wontumi’s 20-year sentence falls within the statutory range of between 15 and 25 years prescribed under the law for the offences.

According to the court, the prosecution had established that Wontumi, as owner and controlling director of Akonta Mining Company Limited, allowed mining activities to take place on the Samreboi concession without the required approval from the Lands Ministry.

The High Court disclosed that Wontumi. permitted Henry Okum and Michael Gyedu Ayisi to undertake mining activities on the concession without obtaining the prior written approval required under Section 14(1) of Act 703.

Wontumi and Akonta Mining have been found guilty on six charges; each count carries a possible sentence of up to 25 years’ imprisonment.

The six charges involved Wontumi, Akonta Mining Company Limited and Kwame Antwi, who remains at large.

The charges, according to JoyNews, included: “Assignment of mineral rights without approval against Bernard Antwi-Boasiako.

Assignment of mineral rights without approval against Kwame Antwi.

Assignment of mineral rights without approval against Akonta Mining Company Limited.

Purposely facilitating an unlicensed mining operation against Bernard Antwi-Boasiako.

Purposely facilitating an unlicensed mining operation against Kwame Antwi.

Purposely facilitating an unlicensed mining operation against Akonta Mining Company Limited.

It will be recalled that Wontumi had earlier pleaded not guilty to all charges when he was arraigned on October 7, 2025, and maintained his innocence throughout the trial.

Earlier, the Accra High Court dismissed an application by lawyers for NPP Ashanti Regional Chairman Bernard Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi, seeking to defer judgment.

The High Court dismissed Atta Akyea’s application seeking to defer judgment aspects of the case to the Supreme Court for constitutional interpretation, before proceeding to deliver its judgment in the Samreboi mining case.

The presiding judge, Justice Audrey Kocuvie-Tay, ruled that the application for adjournment lacked merit after defence counsel informed the court that substantive lawyer Samuel Atta Akyea was out of the country and would return on July 22.

Justice Kocuvie-Tay refused the request, stating that if counsel had a prior engagement, the court ought to have been informed earlier.

“The law on adjournment is for the convenience of the court and lies within the discretion of the court. This court cannot grant the request. The application for adjournment is refused,” the judge ruled.The court has discretion on how a motion should be dealt with. The application need not necessarily be moved. Once the application is filed, it is properly before the court. I deem it moved,” Justice Kocuvie-Tay said.

Justice Kocuvie-Tay subsequently dismissed the application, proceeding with the delivery of judgment.

Watch the video below:

@ghnow_

What Akufo-Addo said about Chairman Wontumi’s Akonta Mining

♬ original sound – GHnow
Verify Numbers on TrustGH